Five Solas Ministry

主なる神の言葉である聖書を、あらゆる事柄に関する最高権威、人生における規範とし、イエス・キリストを主とする神の国(支配)の拡大と完成を願っています。

Rousas John Rushdoony Politics of Guilt and Pity II. 8

Rousas John Rushdoony Politics of Guilt and Pity II. 8
【関心・疑問】

【論文名】
8. LIBERTY AND PROPERTY

【著者名】
Rousas John Rushdoony

【書名・(巻・号)・出版社・出版年・(版)】
Politics of Guilt and Pity, Vallecito, California: Ross House Books, 1995, pp.164-173

【本文の構成】
I. THE POLITICS OF GUILT
 1. MASOCHISM AND ATONEMENT
 2. SCAPEGOATS
 3. THE RETURN OF SLAVERY
 4. HELL AND POLITICS
 5. BLOODGUILTINESS
 6. FALSE RESPONSIBILITY
 7. THE SABBATH, SLAVERY, AND THE PROLETARIAN REVOLUTION
 8. THE POLITICS OF SUICIDE
II. THE POLITICS OF PITY
 1. THE BIBLICAL DOCTRINE OF CHARITY
 2. IDENTIFICATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS
 3. THE HERESY OF LOVE AND THE NEW TYRANNY
 4. THE PURPOSES OF LAW
 5. THE MEANING OF JUSTICE
 6. THE RELATIONSHIP OF MAN TO LAW
 7. TRUTH AND LIBERTY
 8. LIBERTY AND PROPERTY
 9. CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ETHICS: LOVE, JUSTICE, AND COERCION
 10. THE UNITED NATIONS: A RELIGIOUS DREAM
III. THE POLITICS OF MONEY
 1. MONEY AND POWER
 2. MONEY AND CENTRALIZATION OF POWER
 3. THE MORAL FOUNDATIONS OF MONEY
 4. THE SOVIET VIEW OF MONEY
 5. MONEY AND PROGRESS
 6. A BIBLICAL VIEW OF THE PROBLEM OF INTEREST
 7. USURY AND COSMIC IMPERSONALISM
 8. LIMITED LIABILITY AND UNLIMITED MONEY
IV. THE SOCIOLOGY OF JUSTIFICATION
 1. CALVIN IN GENEVA
 2. THE PRIESTLY STATE
 3. THE ROYAL STATE
 4. DEMOCRACY AND DIVINITY
 5. EMINENT DOMAIN
 6. BIBLICAL DOCTRINE OF GOVERNMENT
 7. THE STATE AS PROPHET AND LOGOS
 8. THE POLITICS OF SLAVERY

【内容の要約(ページ数)】
 ラッシュドゥーニーによれば、自由と財産はアメリカの歴史において不可分の関係にあった。(p.164)

【引用したい文章(ページ数)】
When Theodore Roosevelt, speaking at the Sorbonne on April 23, 1910 separated the concept of human rights from property rights, he brought to public attention an approach which was clearly alien to the American system. “Liberty and Property” was a battle-cry of resistance to Parliament’s encroachment in the events leading to the War of Independence. The belief that “a man’s house is his castle” rested on the assumption that liberty and property not only go hand in hand but are inseparable. The increasing separation of property from liberty, and the idea that “human rights” can exist to the detriment of or in opposition to property rights, clearly means the end of the historic American system, if it be continued. To understand the relationship of liberty and property, it is necessary to survey real property in American history. (p.164)

【コメント】